News

El Camino Healthcare District ends misconduct investigation into board member Julia Miller

El Camino Healthcare District's board has wrapped up a controversial investigation into one of its board members. Photo by Michelle Le.

El Camino Healthcare District's board of directors took no action last week following an investigation into complaints that board member Julia Miller was unprofessional and disrespectful to hospital staff.

The decision to end the investigation without taking punitive action against Miller or clearing her of wrongdoing comes amid complaints that the entire process was shrouded in secrecy and came off as a politically motivated witch hunt. Miller is seeking reelection this November in a contested race for the board.

Health care district board Chair Gary Kalbach proposed investigating Miller on July 15, stating that he had received one or more complaints that Miller had acted inappropriately toward staff at a June board meeting. He suggested that this was not an isolated incident, and that Miller had a history of misconduct.

No details beyond that have been made public, including the specific nature of the allegations or who complained. When asked for a copy of the complaint, hospital officials said the allegations against Miller were made verbally. The investigation was carried out by Kalbach and board member George Ting, who submitted a three-paragraph report that does not shed any light on the allegations.

At the Sept. 10 board meeting, Kalbach recommended that the board not take any action, and that the committee and Miller had essentially made a settlement agreement. Miller agreed to drop her oversight role as a liaison to the district's Community Benefit Advisory Council -- tasked with distributing $7.3 million in taxpayer money to health care programs -- in order to "resolve the matter." In reaching the agreement, Miller said she still objects to the investigation and denies any wrongdoing.

What's local journalism worth to you?

Support Mountain View Online for as little as $5/month.

Learn more

Speakers criticized the way the investigation was carried out and the lack of transparency, decrying the board's actions as a political hit job. Gary Kremen, a Los Altos Hills resident and board member of the Santa Clara Valley Water District, called the investigation "purely political" and a witch hunt that amounts to poor governance. He criticized the board's opaque decisions to conduct and conclude the investigation out of the public eye.

Julia Miller

"I believe the public is not served by your actions of holding back what you're going to do, not releasing reports. You can do much better," Kremen said.

Kremen also slammed Kalbach for suggesting that the board did not have to take public comments on the investigation because there was no motion made by any board members. According to the Brown Act, local agencies must provide members of the public the opportunity to address their governing body "on any item of interest to the public" during meetings.

Jean Cohen, the interim director of the South Bay Labor Council, said that she is confident in Miller's leadership, and that it's "unfortunate" that taxpayer dollars are being used for political purposes. Kalbach said the board hired an outside attorney to facilitate the investigation.

Board member Peter Fung, a critic of the investigation, said the timing of the investigation was inappropriate given the upcoming election, and that even he -- a board member -- is still in the dark on most of the details. He said he still doesn't know what Miller did that allegedly amounted to inappropriate or abusive behavior toward staff.

"Are we allowed to know who the complainants are?" Fung asked. "It remains a mystery to all of us -- what actually happened that gave rise to all those complaints."

Kalbach defended his decision, arguing that sweeping the allegations under the rug would have been negligent and even less transparent. Kalbach is not running for reelection this year, which he said absolves him from any political gains he could get from the investigation.

"The general public feels like this board has had way too little transparency," he said. "And I know director Miller has been pushing towards that, pushing towards full transparency."

Kalbach said he adhered to board policies throughout the process, which calls for misconduct complaints to be investigated by two board members for possible action. Who was interviewed during the investigation will not be disclosed, he said, citing attorney-client privilege.

"I sleep at night very well believing that we executed on the policy perfectly," Kalbach said.

Miller was mostly silent during the Sept. 10 meeting, only to say that she was happy for the closure. Ting said he was glad the investigation will close out without taking any action, as strange as that may seem to the public.

"I think this outcome, which can only sound bizarre -- that we make no recommendations -- is a good outcome from my point of view," Ting said.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox.

Sign up

Follow Mountain View Voice Online on Twitter @mvvoice, Facebook and on Instagram @mvvoice for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

El Camino Healthcare District ends misconduct investigation into board member Julia Miller

by / Mountain View Voice

Uploaded: Thu, Sep 17, 2020, 12:29 pm

El Camino Healthcare District's board of directors took no action last week following an investigation into complaints that board member Julia Miller was unprofessional and disrespectful to hospital staff.

The decision to end the investigation without taking punitive action against Miller or clearing her of wrongdoing comes amid complaints that the entire process was shrouded in secrecy and came off as a politically motivated witch hunt. Miller is seeking reelection this November in a contested race for the board.

Health care district board Chair Gary Kalbach proposed investigating Miller on July 15, stating that he had received one or more complaints that Miller had acted inappropriately toward staff at a June board meeting. He suggested that this was not an isolated incident, and that Miller had a history of misconduct.

No details beyond that have been made public, including the specific nature of the allegations or who complained. When asked for a copy of the complaint, hospital officials said the allegations against Miller were made verbally. The investigation was carried out by Kalbach and board member George Ting, who submitted a three-paragraph report that does not shed any light on the allegations.

At the Sept. 10 board meeting, Kalbach recommended that the board not take any action, and that the committee and Miller had essentially made a settlement agreement. Miller agreed to drop her oversight role as a liaison to the district's Community Benefit Advisory Council -- tasked with distributing $7.3 million in taxpayer money to health care programs -- in order to "resolve the matter." In reaching the agreement, Miller said she still objects to the investigation and denies any wrongdoing.

Speakers criticized the way the investigation was carried out and the lack of transparency, decrying the board's actions as a political hit job. Gary Kremen, a Los Altos Hills resident and board member of the Santa Clara Valley Water District, called the investigation "purely political" and a witch hunt that amounts to poor governance. He criticized the board's opaque decisions to conduct and conclude the investigation out of the public eye.

"I believe the public is not served by your actions of holding back what you're going to do, not releasing reports. You can do much better," Kremen said.

Kremen also slammed Kalbach for suggesting that the board did not have to take public comments on the investigation because there was no motion made by any board members. According to the Brown Act, local agencies must provide members of the public the opportunity to address their governing body "on any item of interest to the public" during meetings.

Jean Cohen, the interim director of the South Bay Labor Council, said that she is confident in Miller's leadership, and that it's "unfortunate" that taxpayer dollars are being used for political purposes. Kalbach said the board hired an outside attorney to facilitate the investigation.

Board member Peter Fung, a critic of the investigation, said the timing of the investigation was inappropriate given the upcoming election, and that even he -- a board member -- is still in the dark on most of the details. He said he still doesn't know what Miller did that allegedly amounted to inappropriate or abusive behavior toward staff.

"Are we allowed to know who the complainants are?" Fung asked. "It remains a mystery to all of us -- what actually happened that gave rise to all those complaints."

Kalbach defended his decision, arguing that sweeping the allegations under the rug would have been negligent and even less transparent. Kalbach is not running for reelection this year, which he said absolves him from any political gains he could get from the investigation.

"The general public feels like this board has had way too little transparency," he said. "And I know director Miller has been pushing towards that, pushing towards full transparency."

Kalbach said he adhered to board policies throughout the process, which calls for misconduct complaints to be investigated by two board members for possible action. Who was interviewed during the investigation will not be disclosed, he said, citing attorney-client privilege.

"I sleep at night very well believing that we executed on the policy perfectly," Kalbach said.

Miller was mostly silent during the Sept. 10 meeting, only to say that she was happy for the closure. Ting said he was glad the investigation will close out without taking any action, as strange as that may seem to the public.

"I think this outcome, which can only sound bizarre -- that we make no recommendations -- is a good outcome from my point of view," Ting said.

Comments

Corporate payoff?
Registered user
Shoreline West
on Sep 17, 2020 at 12:53 pm
Corporate payoff?, Shoreline West
Registered user
on Sep 17, 2020 at 12:53 pm
8 people like this

The hospital is operated by a corporation and the elected members of the health care district board may also serve on the corporate board ON GOOD BEHAVIOR. Is that how it works? If so, here's the next question: what money or other benefits are given to members of the corporate board? Isn't there a conflict of interest for elected board members to also serve on the corporate board?


Due process needed
Registered user
another community
on Sep 17, 2020 at 3:02 pm
Due process needed, another community
Registered user
on Sep 17, 2020 at 3:02 pm
7 people like this

Shame on John Zoglin and Gary Kalbach for beginning this sham process to try to smear Julia Miller. Double shame on John Zoglin and Gary Kalbach for ending this nothingburger trumped up complaint without fully clearing Julia Miller. What a nasty political stunt! Did they think they could do this to Julia Miller because she is the only woman on the board? Thanks so much to Gary Kremen, board member of the Santa Clara Valley Water District, for standing up for Julia Miller and not letting a long-time public servant be treated so shabbily, and also not permitting women to be slapped around in this way. We need more women on the ECH District Board.


Corporate payoff?
Registered user
Shoreline West
on Sep 17, 2020 at 4:04 pm
Corporate payoff?, Shoreline West
Registered user
on Sep 17, 2020 at 4:04 pm
7 people like this

What does any member of this health care district board do FOR THE PUBLIC if the member also oversees or works for the corporation that operates the hospital? Something is not right here. Is the county Civil Grand Jury still functioning?


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

In order to encourage respectful and thoughtful discussion, commenting on stories is available to those who are registered users. If you are already a registered user and the commenting form is not below, you need to log in. If you are not registered, you can do so here.

Please make sure your comments are truthful, on-topic and do not disrespect another poster. Don't be snarky or belittling. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

See our announcement about requiring registration for commenting.