Study: When it comes to polarization across the globe, America leads the way | News | Mountain View Online |

News

Study: When it comes to polarization across the globe, America leads the way

Researchers seek to understand why America's political divide has grown faster and larger than those in eight other democracies

America’s widening political divide stands out above other nations, according to a new cross-country polarization study by Stanford University economists.

Over the past four decades, the chilly chasm of negative sentiment between Democrats and Republicans in the U.S. has nearly doubled, and it has grown faster and larger compared to the partisan climates of eight other established democracies analyzed in the study.

In three other nations — Canada, New Zealand and Switzerland — political polarization rose as well but to a lesser extent. During the same period, polarization decreased in the five other countries — Australia, Britain, Norway, Sweden and Germany.

The study — released as a working paper Jan. 20 by the National Bureau of Economic Research — is the first to provide cross-country evidence on long-term trends in inter-party sentiment. The research was conducted by Stanford economist Matthew Gentzkow, Jesse Shapiro of Brown University, and Levi Boxell, a Stanford PhD student. The researchers also teamed up for a 2017 study challenging the idea that the internet played an outsized role in causing polarization.

Today’s divisive discourse in and outside of government halls is a sign that partisanship has grown in the U.S., but the researchers wanted to evaluate whether or not this was a distinctly American phenomenon, and to shed light on possible factors.

“Understanding this trend is really important. There’s a lot of discussion on the rise of polarization and its implications,” said Gentzkow, a senior fellow at the Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (SIEPR). “But the reasons why polarization is increasing are unclear, and knowing whether a reason is specific to the U.S. or if it’s more universal is helpful in assessing those explanations.”

The trio of economists set out to understand trends and potential explanations behind the feelings of dislike or animosity between citizens aligned with opposing parties — an aspect of partisanship that notable political scholars, including Shanto Iyengar, Morris Fiorina and Neil Malhotra, all of Stanford, refer to as “affective polarization.”

Gentzkow and his colleagues compared nine member nations of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development that had longstanding national public opinion surveys on politically related questions.

Using survey data from 1975 through 2017, they analyzed the thermometer-like ratings of how “warm” or “cold” a respondent feels toward others in the opposing political party, or responses indicating the extent one sympathized with a given party.

“The average American used to feel positive about their own party and kind of neutral about the opposite party,” Gentzkow said. “But now they are positive about their party and quite negative about the opposing party.”

According to the study, in 1978, the average gap of negative sentiment between Democrats and Republicans was 27 points. By 2016, that difference grew to 46.

To evaluate possible explanations for the growing gap, the researchers examined some concurrent societal trends. If, for instance, the emergence of the internet was a driver of polarization, then the universal rise in internet usage and broadband penetration should have resulted in a greater degree of partisanship across the countries, the researchers say.

But contrary to what some may think, those particular factors did not appear to play an important role, as more than half of the countries in the analysis instead showed a shrinking political divide.

Similarly, the researchers found that partisanship trends were not apparently swayed by the relatively universal increases in global trade, immigration, or economic inequality.

Growing racial divisions, however, could have played a role, the study suggests. Countries with rising polarization had also experienced double the increases in the share of their non-white population compared to countries where polarization decreased.

Another potential factor could lie with how the U.S. has had a more distinctive shift in party coalitions over time. Lines along ideological issues deepened, and the makeup of political parties became more aligned along racial, geographical and economic attributes, Gentzkow said.

The researchers also suggested that the rise of 24-hour partisan cable TV networks may have played a larger role in the U.S. than elsewhere, citing a 2017 study by Gregory Martin and Ali Yurukoglu of Stanford. In addition, more public funds were spent per capita on public broadcast media in the five countries where polarization fell.

“We don’t have any way in this study to isolate the causes of polarization,” Gentzkow said. “We’re just looking for facts that might help set the stage for that future research more clearly.”

This article was originally published by Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (SIEPR) on its website.

Local Journalism.
What is it worth to you?

Comments

14 people like this
Posted by Observer
a resident of Old Mountain View
on Jan 25, 2020 at 6:35 pm

So I guess it has nothing to do with 50 years of identity politics and the never ending push of minority groups to define the political space. The middle ground and compromise are forgotten concepts.

And this paper only adds fuel to the fire with it's completely lop-sided political journalism.


13 people like this
Posted by Community Minded
a resident of another community
on Jan 27, 2020 at 2:32 pm

@Observer, By “50 years of identity politics and the never ending push of minority groups to define the political space” do you mean the unfinished job of making America work for everyone and not just white men? Perhaps you are right that progress on racial and gender equality has led to increased polarization — owing to a backlash by those who have unfairly held outsized power for so long seeking to maintain / increase their power. We do need to address polarization in our nation and communities, but not by giving up on equality.


12 people like this
Posted by PeaceLove
a resident of Shoreline West
on Jan 27, 2020 at 3:51 pm

@Observer - It has often been noted that when those who have ALL the power begin to have to share some of it they can feel as though they are being marginalized and discriminated against. This is a natural evolutionary impulse and is a sign your old paradigm is deconstructing and is trying to hold onto itself. Good news is you are on the verge of a breakthrough into a more holistic view of reality.


5 people like this
Posted by PeaceLove
a resident of Shoreline West
on Jan 27, 2020 at 3:57 pm

More generally, the perverse incentives of media and our current form of governance actually promotes divisiveness, the former for profit and the latter as a political tactic to prevent the American people from uniting to take back our country. A unified populace can more easily get our act together and reform society for the better -- which inevitably means legacy systems like corporate media and centralized (and corrupted) governments will be replaced with something better. A system more transparent, accountable, able to respond dynamically in real time, and with a clearly-defined focus to improve individuals, culture and society.


1 person likes this
Posted by Bruce Karney
a resident of Old Mountain View
on Jan 29, 2020 at 10:50 am

I believe that the US is nearly unique among the countries studied in having (for all practical purposes) a 2-party system rather than a multi-party parliamentary system. It seems to me that could be something that could be studied. If we had 3 or 4 strong parties like Canada or most of Europe I think there would be more compromise in the policy-making process rather than the current "if I win, you must lose" approach that dominates national politics.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields


Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox.

Redwood City gets two new barbecue restaurants
By Elena Kadvany | 3 comments | 5,454 views

Flying: How to lower your impact
By Sherry Listgarten | 19 comments | 3,244 views

Premarital and Couples: Here Be Dragons!
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 2,655 views

My angst about the disaster of these two debates
By Diana Diamond | 28 comments | 1,608 views

Finding Your Calling
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 1 comment | 1,275 views

 

Short story writers wanted!

The 34th Annual Palo Alto Weekly Short Story Contest is now accepting entries for Adult, Young Adult and Teen categories. Send us your short story (2,500 words or less) and entry form by March 27, 2020. First, Second and Third Place prizes awarded in each category.

View Details