Neighbors threaten to sue over McKelvey plan Other Issues, posted by Editor, Mountain View Voice Online, on Dec 5, 2012 at 2:57 pm
A plan to turn McKelvey Park into a flood detention basin has drawn the ire of neighbors who say they may sue over plans that could increase noise from the park's baseball fields while removing the large redwood trees that shade their homes.
Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, December 5, 2012, 1:55 PM
Posted by Downstream, a resident of the Rex Manor neighborhood, on Dec 5, 2012 at 2:57 pm
Once again, we see selfish NIMBYism opposing something that's good for a larger community. How much noise do you get from a Little League field? And the kids are only there during the day. I also don't like to see trees removed, but new trees will grow back. Basically, these people don't give a damn if their downstream neighbors get flooded out. As long as their own little lives are not inconvenienced.
Posted by NW Resident, a resident of the North Whisman neighborhood, on Dec 5, 2012 at 3:15 pm
One minor inaccuracy of the article is that only Big McKelvey's field orientation is being rotated in this design, compared with its current layout today. Little McKelvey keeps its current orientation, facing Miramonte Ave.
Whichever way the big field ultimately faces, it seems that one row of bleachers will still have to be on the MV Avenue side near the residents, unless it's rotated so that home plate is near Miramonte, which doesn't seem like a very good fit.
Posted by Konrad M. Sosnow, a resident of another community, on Dec 5, 2012 at 4:07 pm
It seems to me that the Santa Clara Valley Water District has a lot of money and wants to dig somewhere. Now that they have abandoned plans to dig up Cuesta Park Annex, they need another playground. How about letting them go out to the salt ponds and play there?
Posted by Saejin, a resident of the Shoreline West neighborhood, on Dec 6, 2012 at 12:36 am
At the meeting the water district said it would cost 80 Million to update Permanente Creek so that it could carry the 100 year flood and they were only given 40 Million, so they elected to build the retention pond. Keep in mind the park will be badly damaged each time they flood it. The retention approach only handles a short term peak, beyond which it does not fix the problem. Clearly a bandaid not a fix.
Complete waste of money.
This park will have lights. It will have loud speakers announcing each batter up. If I lived next door I would take the city to court to block this design. A large portion of the park is being used for parking lot without a single tree for shade. Why not put the parking next to the houses? Beter yet.... fix the creek... leave the park alone....
While the plans aren't perfect, and probably cannot be, one should consider the benefits that this project brings to the area, and if you look closely at the map, actually including the houses next to the park. Without protection, they will probably get flooded sooner or later.
Hopefully some compromise can be found with respect to how McKelvey park should be upgraded with the new flood protection feature. Shrinking the big field just a tad so it can be rotated and provide some space for trees to fit in, or doing away with one of the circles would seem sensible, perhaps. It would seem that kids can easily walk from either circle to the fields or the park, and the circles use valuable space (including perhaps, the right one might make rotation of the big field harder?).
By the way, one funny thing. If you look at this from a satellite picture, the area that's immediately south of it ... is yet another baseball field. One kinda does wonder how many baseball fields are needed on such a short stretch. But please ... lawsuits seem like a pretty inefficient way to find a solution / improvement. Thanks for being considerate!
Posted by Cynthia Riordan, a resident of another community, on Dec 6, 2012 at 8:59 pm
The water district's flood projections are exaggerated by 200%. Although they have been collecting data on water levels for decades, they have not used this data in their flood projections because the data does not show a need for flood basins. A large 2 acre pond in Rancho San Antonio has been handling Permanente Creek overflow since the 1950's. Permanente Creek has not flooded since the culvert behind Blach School was built in 1959.
Posted by Ralph, a resident of another community, on Dec 7, 2012 at 10:12 am
This is needed because of global warming and raising sea levels will soon cause Mountain View to be under water. So unless you all want to live under water you better give in to this. Live in fear of global warming and give hundreds of billions to the UN so they will save all of us.