News

Council weighs office, hotel proposals for Moffett Gateway

On Tuesday four developers sought the City Council's favor to develop the city-owned Moffett Gateway property, presenting various ways to arrange hotel and office buildings on the 6.7-acre site on Moffett Boulevard at Highway 101.

Developers wooed the city with fancy renderings and promises to bring in brand-name hoteliers, public amenities like park space, signature restaurants, long-desired conference and meeting rooms, environmentally friendly LEED silver buildings, bike sharing programs and bridges to the Stevens Creek Trail. Narrowed down from 12 initial proposals, all four included hotels, some with office space.

The council met behind closed doors afterwards to discuss the proposals and will officially select a developer on June 24, said Alex Andrade, the city's economic development director.

Because of the city's booming tech industry, "there's a lot of travelers coming here with nowhere to stay -- that's the reality," said Robert Olson, CEO of R.D. Olson, one of the prospective developers. Olson noted in his presentation that there is over 800,000 square feet of office being built in Mountain View and much more in the works. "Try to get a room tonight, it's crazy," he said.

The city purchased the site several years ago for $9.5 million and last year the City Council agreed with the goal of leasing it to generate revenue for city services.

City staff and their consultants do not recommend the site for housing, as it would not bring in as much revenue as hotel and office development and would suffer from freeway noise. "(Housing is) not appropriate due to existence of TCE, which makes it less desirable," said Andrade on Tuesday.

He was referring to a portion of the site's soil and groundwater that is contaminated with trichloroethylene (TCE), something that hasn't always stopped housing development elsewhere in the city. A city-commissioned report pointed to a leaky sewer line -- which connects to a Whisman Road Superfund site -- as the source. An Environmental Protection Agency investigation is still underway that might hold early computer chip makers responsible for cleanup costs, but Andrade said the city will require that developers pay for cleaning up the site, as well as installing "vapor barriers and any mitigation efforts needed" to prevent TCE vapors from getting trapped inside buildings.

Among the supporters of hotel space for the site was Lenny Siegel of the Campaign for a Balanced Mountain View, a group which is advocating for balancing the city's job growth with adequate housing growth. Siegel is also director of the Center for Public Environmental Oversight, and attended the meeting mostly to make sure developers knew the site's toxics needed mitigation. He did not advocate for housing there.

"This area needs a hotel (and an) extended-stay hotel makes sense," Siegel said. "We have companies like Google using apartments as extended-stay hotels so it takes a little bit of pressure off the rental market."

As previously reported in the Voice, Google has been leasing apartments at the new Madera apartment complex on Evelyn Avenue for employees visiting from around the world.

Developer designs compared

All of the projects also included a restaurant and hotel component, as well as publicly accessible open space. The designs are conceptual and preliminary, and all four come in under the 1.85 floor area ratio density in the city's general plan, though two go above the four-story limit for the site: R.D. Olson proposes six stories and Hines Interests LP proposed going an unspecified amount over four stories.

All four developers have expressed interest in buying an adjacent 3-acre site from Caltrans -- which developers said Caltrans wants to sell -- to make the site 10 acres. But only R.D. Olson and Hines Interests LP included the parcel in possible designs for the project.

R.D. Olson

Irvine-based R.D. Olson Development pitched $126.9 million in hotel buildings for the entire 10-acre site, and no offices. There would be two Marriott brand hotels: a 250-room, six-story full-service hotel and 160 room Residence Inn, described as an "extended stay" hotel. If Caltrans does not want to sell the corner parcel, the company also proposed a smaller $61 million "back up plan" with a 135-room Residence Inn and a 120-room Courtyard by Marriott hotel.

"I don't think the back up plan happens because Caltrans wants to make a deal," said Olson.

Both of the proposals include a 5,000-square-foot restaurant space along Moffett Boulevard, a pedestrian bridge across Stevens Creek, LEED Silver buildings and 10,000 square feet of meeting space, including a 7,500-square-foot conference space.

The company boasted being named Marriott's 2014 developer of the year and promised "the city's first 4.5 star hotel."

Hines Interests LP

Houston-based Hines Interests LP proposed offices and hotel use on the full 10-acre site, including two office towers along Highway 101 totaling 260,000 square feet, surpassing four stories to an unspecified height, Andrade said. The hotel component is a 180-room hotel along Moffett Boulevard. If Caltrans doesn't sell its 3-acre parcel by the freeway, the company proposes a 140,000-square-foot office building, a 136-room boutique hotel and 3,000 square feet of retail for the 6.7-acre site the city owns.

The company did not indicate that it would include meeting space or a pedestrian bridge over the creek. There would, however, be an electric car charging station, a bike share program, a shuttle service and membership in the city's Transit Management Association.

Its representative said that it is "a great time to build an office building and have it be successful" and urged the council to not take too much of a risk on hotel development. "There are a lot of hotels under development in various stages of planning and construction right now."

Broadreach Capital

San Francisco-based Broadreach Capital Partners pitched a proposal for 136,000 square feet of office, and a 182-room hotel, which would go on the 6.7 acre site only. Public benefits include 3,000 to 5,000 square feet of meeting space and a bike and pedestrian creek bridge to the Stevens Creek Trail. It includes LEED Silver buildings, a bike sharing program and membership in the city's Transit Management Agency, which runs a shuttle service for its members.

The company boasts owning $24 billion worth of property.

T2 Hospitality

Pitching a proposal for the 6.7-acre site only, Newport Beach-based T2 Hospitality proposed a three-hotel campus totaling 483 rooms: an extended stay hotel with 124 rooms, a business class hotel with 169 rooms and a "lifestyle brand" with 190 rooms.

The proposal includes no pedestrian bridge over Stevens Creek, but there's 10,000 square feet of total meeting space, LEED Silver buildings, a car sharing program, a bike sharing program and membership in the city's Transit Management Association.

The developer boasted interest in the project from nine "premium brand" hotel companies, including Hilton, AC hotels and Marriott.

Hotel revenue appears promising

T2's Mont Williamson presented a chart that revealed one reason why a hotel is so attractive to the city 62.4 percent of the city's revenue from the site could come from hotel taxes, also known as "transient occupancy taxes." Another developer revealed that hotel lease revenue would likely be less than from housing or office because when bidding for private real estate, "hotels cannot compete with office or multi-family (housing) for land pricing," said Olson.

"There's a great demand for hotel rooms in Silicon Valley," Williamson said, showing a graph that put the area to be relatively profitable, at "6 to 7 revenue basis points above the national market." He showed a map of the region with northern Mountain View highlighted and said, "There's a little hole right here that has no hotel product."

There are three other hotel proposals elsewhere in the city, including another on city-owned land: a Virgin Hotel proposed for the city parking lots at Hope Street and Evelyn Avenue downtown. A seven story and 165 room hotel is proposed as part of in Merlone Geier's second phase of development at San Antonio Shopping Center, and there's yet another by Shashi Group LLC: a 200-room, five-story hotel near Google headquarters on a 1.4-acre site at 1625 North Shoreline Blvd.

"You can build office space anywhere and we are," said longtime resident and neighbor of the site, Robert Weaver. "I think it should be hotel, 100 percent. Office space can go any place else. We have a dearth of ballroom meeting hall facilities," he said, recalling that the city's Chamber of Commerce had to go to a Palo Alto hotel to host a recent award ceremony.

Comments

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Martin Omander
a resident of Rex Manor
on Jun 12, 2014 at 2:54 pm

Mr Siegel makes a good point about hotels. People visiting me keep telling me it's almost impossible to find a hotel room. That forces corporations to rent apartments, so their visitors have somewhere to stay. Building new hotel rooms will ease the pressure on the apartment rental market.

Besides the hotel rooms, we also need new housing of course. Mixed development and walkable neighborhoods is the way to go, so not everyone has to use a car for everything.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Garrett
a resident of another community
on Jun 12, 2014 at 3:53 pm

Older motels and other overnight lodging will not be able to keep up with newer properties, remodel or redevelopment into housing will take place. New restaurants and meeting rooms plus college kids and teenagers could use jobs.

City could use to tax money, not just for pensions and wages but to strengthen the tax base.

You have to be ready for the next big downturn.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Julie
a resident of North Whisman
on Jun 12, 2014 at 4:12 pm

I agree with a hotel. I would like to the project include a connection to the Stevens Creek Trail.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Z
a resident of Rex Manor
on Jun 21, 2014 at 2:52 pm

With all the talk about the Jobs-Housing imbalance and the need for low income housing, the City should build low income housing - it's a no-brainer.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

I Told My Mom She's Dying
By Chandrama Anderson | 10 comments | 2,350 views

Grab a Bowl of Heaven soon in Mountain View
By Elena Kadvany | 0 comments | 1,566 views

Quick Check List for UC Applications
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 0 comments | 980 views

Fancy Fast and Fun!
By Laura Stec | 3 comments | 863 views

Palo Alto and Bay Area Election Facts and Thoughts on the Implications
By Steve Levy | 2 comments | 470 views