Why Are Two Plastic Bag Propositions on the California Ballot? | The Food Party! | Laura Stec | Mountain View Online |

Local Blogs

The Food Party!

By Laura Stec

E-mail Laura Stec

About this blog: I've been attracted to food for good and bad reasons for many years. From eating disorder to east coast culinary school, food has been my passion, profession & nemesis. I've been a sugar addict, a 17-year vegetarian, a food and en...  (More)

View all posts from Laura Stec

Why Are Two Plastic Bag Propositions on the California Ballot?

Uploaded: Oct 23, 2016

Americans Food Party! with approximately 100 billion single-use plastic bags a year, and as many as 15 billion in California alone.

A friend of mine and I were going over the proposals on the ballot just yesterday, and realized one of us was voting for both CA proposals 65 and 67.

If one is good, two votes are better, right?

Turns out the plastic bag industry is behind Proposal 65, which allocates funds for the sale of carryout bags to a wildlife conservation board. Sounds good at first, but this would overturn the plastic bag ban already set to take effect in California. So Proposition 67 is also on the ballot, giving voters the opportunity to uphold that original ban.

Whichever of these proposals gets the most votes wins; only one will go into effect.

So please…

Consider a "no" vote on 65 and a “yes”vote on 67.



- photo from nationofchange.org

Comments

 +   2 people like this
Posted by Bob, a resident of Blossom Valley,
on Oct 26, 2016 at 7:31 am

Your retelling of the linked article was awful. You might as well have just copied and pasted the link and left nothing else in the body of the article because you added no clarity and no substance to what was already written somewhere else. D+.


 +   1 person likes this
Posted by Laura Stec, a resident of another community,
on Oct 26, 2016 at 7:42 am

Bob, yes thank you for the spanking, and you are right. I wanted to write something about this issue, but it has been crazy busy. Actually, my initial intent was to do a whole play on plasticity, elasticity and "nastiscity," but time did not allow. So I leave with No on 65. Yes on 67, take the instructive criticism, and come back next week to try again.

Nastiscity. Nastistics. There has to be a place for this in the future


 +   2 people like this
Posted by Chris, a resident of Monta Loma,
on Oct 27, 2016 at 5:21 pm

Thank you, Laura! This was very helpful to me.



Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:

Follow this blogger (Receive an email when blogger makes a new post)

SUBMIT

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

You Dirty Little Thing
By Laura Stec | 10 comments | 14,153 views

Celebrity chef pulls out of BFD Menlo Park; to reopen as new concept
By Elena Kadvany | 6 comments | 6,072 views

“Housewife” a Journey of Transgender Marriage
By Chandrama Anderson | 1 comment | 2,314 views